“双一流”背景下学科评价体系的发展对策  

Suggestions on Developing Discipline Evaluation System in the Context of“Double First-Class”

作　　者：张万龙 张立杰[2] 尹健[2] 肖俊[2] 刘鹏[2] ZHANG Wan-long;ZHANG Li-jie;YIN Jian;XIAO Jun;LIU Peng(Graduate College,National University of Defense Technology,Changsha 410073,China)

机构地区：[1]国防科技大学研究生院学科学位处,湖南长沙410073 [2]国防科技大学研究生院,湖南长沙410073

出　　处：《高等教育研究学报》2022年第1期81-84,共4页Journal of Higher Education Research

基　　金：湖南省学位与研究生教学改革研究项目(2021JGYB017);湖南省学位与研究生教学改革研究项目(2021JGYB016);全国教育科学国防军事教育学科规划课题(JYKYD2019006);国防科技大学“学校建设发展重大专题研究计划”课题(21-ZTYJJH-24)。

摘　　要：随着“双一流”一期建设的圆满收官,我国高校正式迈向了内涵建设、特色建设的快车道,进一步改进提升学科评价体系依然是学界关注的焦点。本文对当前我国学科评价体系进行了分类并对其特点进行了总结,认为现阶段学科评价还存在着本土特色不够鲜明、体制机制不够完善以及贡献评价不够健全等问题。认为未来的学科评价体系应该朝着坚持分类评价、加强自我评价以及突出贡献评价等方向持续发力,为统筹推进一流学科建设和世界一流大学建设提供支撑。The success of the first phase of the“double first-class”construction suggests that Chinese universities have officially moved towards the fast lane of connotation construction and characteristic construction.It is still the focus of academic attention to further improve the discipline evaluation system.This paper classifies the current discipline evaluation systems in China and summarizes their characteristics.Discipline evaluation so far still faces problems such as unclear local characteristics,inadequate system and mechanism and imperfect contribution evaluation.It argues that the future discipline evaluation system should adhere to classifying evaluation,strengthening self-evaluation and highlighting contribution evaluation.And it should continue to make efforts to provide support for the overall promotion of the construction of first-class disciplines and the construction of world-class universities.

关 键 词：“双一流”建设 评价体系 现状 建议 

分 类 号：G647[文化科学—高等教育学]