检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晓薇 郑晓静[1] LI Xiao-wei;ZHENG Xiao-jing(Law School,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100024,China)
出 处:《海南开放大学学报》2022年第1期65-72,共8页Journal of Hainan Open University
摘 要:取保候审制度是我国刑事诉讼程序中的一项重要内容,与其他的刑事措施体现出的强制性不同,取保候审制度的特点在于其人权保障性。目前,我国取保候审制度存在的缺陷主要在于其适用范围、适用方式、事后救济程序以及决定权的规制方面不够具体、明确,尚未将其人权保障功能发挥到最大化。客观评价国内取保候审制度实践成果,积极借鉴国外先进立法经验,贯彻无罪推定和人权保障理念,合理控制国家机关权力,扩大适用范围、丰富适用方式、增添事后救济手段,是当事人取保候审权利实现强有力的保障。The bail pending trial system is an important part of the criminal procedure in our country.It is different from the compulsiveness embodied by other criminal measures. The characteristic of the bail pending trial system lies in its human rights protection. At present, the main shortcomings of our country’s release on guarantee pending trial system are that its scope of application, methods of application,subsequent relief procedures, and the regulation of decision-making powers are not specific and clear enough, and its human rights protection function has not been maximized. Objectively evaluating the practical results of the domestic bail pending trial system, actively learning from advanced foreign legislation experience, implementing the presumption of innocence and the concept of human rights protection,reasonably controlling the powers of state agencies, expanding the scope of application, enriching the application methods, and adding post-mortem remedies are the realization of the party’s right to bail pending trial Strong guarantee.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15