组态视角下工作繁荣的形成机制研究  

Research on the Formation Mechanism of Thriving at Work Based on the Perspective of Configuration

作　　者：韩翼[1] 宗树伟 刘庚 HAN Yi;ZONG Shuwei;LIU Geng(Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学工商管理学院,武汉市430073

出　　处：《管理学报》2022年第3期351-361,共11页Chinese Journal of Management

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(71972181);国家社会科学基金资助项目(14BGL199);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(19XJJC630001)。

摘　　要：以75个团队领导和278位员工的配对数据为调查样本,运用模糊集定性比较分析方法(fsQCA)整合部门情境特征、工作资源、动因性工作行为3个层面的5个前因条件,基于组态视角探讨了影响员工工作繁荣与团队集体繁荣的多重等效驱动路径及其内在形成机制。研究结果表明:心理资本、团队心理资本分别在实现员工工作繁荣的过程中,以及在实现团队集体繁荣的过程中发挥普适的作用;同时,存在3种模式驱动员工产生高工作繁荣,即情境-行为联合主导模式、情境主导模式和资源主导模式,且情境-行为联合主导模式较其他两种模式具有更高的解释程度。此外,还存在4种模式促使团队产生高集体繁荣,分别为集体情境-行为联合主导模式、集体情境-资源-行为联动模式、集体情境-资源联合主导模式、集体情境主导模式。Using paired data from 75 team leaders and 278 employees as survey samples,the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA) was applied to integrate 5 antecedent conditions at 3 levels of unit contextual features,work resources,and agentic work behaviors to explore the multiple equivalent driving paths affecting thriving at work and collective thriving at work and their intrinsic formation mechanisms based on the configuration perspective.The findings suggested that psychological capital played a pervasive role in achieving thriving at work of employees and team psychological capital played a pervasive role in achieving collective thriving at work of teams.Meanwhile,there were three models that drove employees to generate high level of thriving status,namely the context & behavior-based model,the context-based model,and the resource-based model.Among them,the context & behavior-based model had a higher explanation degree than the others.Finally,there existed 4 models that drove teams to generate high levels of collective thriving at work,namely,the collective context & behavior-based model,the collective context-resource-behavior model,the collective context & resource-based model,and the collective context-based model.

关 键 词：工作繁荣 集体繁荣 形成机制 定性比较分析 

分 类 号：C93[经济管理—管理学]