清代民事纠纷解决机制探析  

An Analysis of the Mechanism for Solving Civil Disputes in the Qing Dynasty

作　　者：程方 MA Xiao-xue CHENG Fang;MA Xiao-xue(School of Political Science and Law,Jinan University,Jinan 250022,China)

机构地区：[1]济南大学政法学院,山东济南250022 [2]不详

出　　处：《聊城大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第2期88-95,共8页Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划项目(16CLSJ03):清代民间法的社会治理功能研究;山东省社会科学规划地方党史研究专项(19CDSJ03):清代山东地方志研究。

摘　　要：在司法理念上,清代官员主张教化,视无讼、息讼为最高的司法原则;而司法实践中,地方官职权的全面化,“一人政府”的制度构建,使地方官对案件应接不暇,更多地采取息事宁人或让位于地方调解的办法;诉讼当事人则更多的从诉讼目的是否达到,作为地方官审判公正与否的衡量标准,并相应的采取缠讼、上控等策略,对地方官的息讼政策产生了巨大的压力和挑战。In terms of judicial theory,in the Qing dynasty officials who held the view of edification understood that the highest judicial principle was to avoid and end litigation.But in the judicial practice,all-powerful local officials who formed“one-man government”were too busy to hear the case,so that they moved to end the dispute and calm the people or to turn to local mediation in many places.The litigants would evaluate whether the purpose of litigation has been achieved and whether the local officals have fairly tried the case,then they would take measures to make the litigation rumble on or file an appeal,which brought a great deal of pressure and challenge on the litigation policy of local officials.

关 键 词：息讼 健讼 上控 调解 

分 类 号：K249[历史地理—历史学]