检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张丽华 ZHANG Lihua(Second Department of Neurology,Yanbian Brain Hospital,Yanji Jilin 133000,China)
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2022年第5期169-172,共4页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的 对神经内科患者实施基础护理与细节化护理的临床效果进行对比。方法 对2019年12月—2020年12月收治的78例神经内科患者的相关数据进行总结及回顾性分析。按照患者住院号实施奇偶分组法,将患者分为研究组(细节化护理)与对照组(基础护理),每组39例,对上述方案实施后患者的疾病恢复情况进行对比,观察细节化护理的可行性。结果 研究组护理满意度、护理效果评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);风险事件、并发症发生率对比,研究组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 与基础护理相比,细节化护理效果显著,对神经内科患者具有积极意义,可以帮助患者实现快速康复。Objective To compare the clinical effects of basic nursing and detailed nursing in neurology patients. Methods The relevant data of 78 neurology patients admitted from December 2019 to December 2020 were summarized and retrospectively analyzed. The oddeven grouping method was implemented according to the patient’s hospitalization number, and the patients were divided into the study group(detailed nursing) and the control group(basic nursing), with 39 cases in each group. The disease recovery of the patients after the implementation of the above scheme was compared, and the feasibility of detailed nursing was observed. Results Nursing satisfaction and nursing effect scores in the study group were higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). The incidence of risk events and complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with basic nursing, detailed nursing has significant effect, has positive significance for neurology patients, and can help patients achieve rapid recovery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222