从文学研究到话语建构——乔国强教授访谈  

From Literary Studies to the Construction of Theoretical Discourse: Interviewing Professor Qiao Guoqiang

作　　者：郑佳 乔国强[2] ZHENG Jia;QIAO Guoqiang

机构地区：[1]江苏师范大学外国语学院 [2]上海外国语大学

出　　处：《广东外语外贸大学学报》2022年第2期17-27,157,共12页Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies

摘　　要：乔国强教授是国内著名的外国文学研究专家,在英美文学、西方文论、叙述学、比较文学等领域均有很高的造诣。在本篇访谈中,乔国强教授就美国犹太文学、叙述学和中国话语体系等一系列问题谈论了自己的看法。在乔国强教授看来,犹太文学不仅有无穷的魅力,而且有鲜明的族裔特征,特别是犹太"大屠杀"文学,直接或间接反映了犹太作家的身份性和道德取向。同时,乔国强教授从叙述学的角度分析了文学史叙事的虚构性,并指出叙述学作为一种批评方法需要与其他相关学科以及其他批评模式相结合才能获得更广阔的发展空间。最后,乔国强教授以多元融合的立场,提出建构中国叙述学和中国话语理论要扎根中国文化传统,兼收西方思想精髓,形成既能融入国际学术又能凸显民族特色的研究体系,这需要我们的研究者树立主体意识,不断为之努力。Professor Qiao Guoqiang is a distinguished scholar in foreign literature studies in China,with high attainments in the fields of English and American literature,western literary theory,narratology,and comparative literature. In this interview,Professor Qiao talks about his views on a list of issues,including American Jewish literature,narratology,and Chinese discourse system. In his view,American Jewish literature is not only fascinating,but also has distinct ethnic characteristics,especially Holocaust literature,which directly or indirectly reflects the identity and moral orientation of the writers. At the same time,Professor Qiao analyzes the fictional nature of literary history from the perspective of narrative,and points out that narratology as a critical method needs to be combined with other related academic disciplines and other critical models in order to gain a broader scope for development. Finally,he proposes that the construction of Chinese narrative theory and Chinese discourse system should be rooted in Chinese cultural traditions and incorporate the essence of Western thoughts,so as to form a research system that can both integrate itself into the international academia and reflects our national characteristics. We need to accomplish this task by building up a sense of independence in research.

关 键 词：美国犹太文学 叙述学 中国叙述学 中国话语体系 

分 类 号：I02[文学—文学理论]