检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡锴 文家春 Hu Kai;Wen Jiachun(Sino-Europe School of Intellectual Property,Shanghai Institute of Technology,Shanghai 200235,China;Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China)
机构地区:[1]上海应用技术大学中欧知识产权学院,上海200235 [2]同济大学上海国际知识产权学院,上海200092
出 处:《科技管理研究》2022年第5期112-120,共9页Science and Technology Management Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目“基于低质量专利申请抑制效应的专利收费结构优化研究”(71974145)。
摘 要:借由组织制度理论视角与典型组织的调查,研究科技服务组织的制度系统特征及其影响作用。研究发现,政府、市场双重主导逻辑提供组织服务创新的依据和原则,并渗透进入组织场域;不同服务类型表现出双重逻辑差异化的作用形式与冲突强度;将4种典型服务产品与模式纳入一个组织响应制度系统影响的二维理论化模型,可有效解释当前科技服务组织及其服务创新的现状。相关结论启示政策供给与制度建设应围绕科技服务组织和服务市场生态,进一步明确政策边界、组织专业逻辑挖掘、分类引导评价等重点问题,科技服务组织也应树立制度复杂性思维并构建企业竞争战略。The existing theories lack explanation on how institutional complexity affects the service innovation.From the perspective of organizational institutional theory and the investigation of typical organizations, it studies the institutional system characteristics and its influence of science and technology service organizations. The results show that the dual dominant logics of government and market provide the basis and principle of organizational service innovation, and penetrate into the organizational field. The different service types show the function form and conflict intensity of dual logics differentiation. The four typical service products and modes are incorporated into a two-dimensional theoretical model of organizational response to institutional system, which can effectively explain the current situation of science and technology service organization and its service innovation. The relevant conclusions enlighten that policy supply and system construction should focus on the ecology of scientific and technological service organizations and service markets, further clarify key issues such as policy boundaries, professional logic mining of organizations, classification guidance and evaluation, etc. Scientific and technological service organizations should also establish institutional complexity thinking and build enterprise competition strategies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.227.209.41