刑法修订的总评、回应与完善路径  

The Overall Evaluation,View Responses and Improvement Paths of Criminal Law Amendment

作　　者：刘祎铭 LIU Yi-ming(School of Law of Xiangtan University,Xiangtan Hunan 411100)

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411100

出　　处：《牡丹江大学学报》2022年第3期74-80,108,共8页Journal of Mudanjiang University

摘　　要：我国刑法的修订是在立法活跃的时代背景、国民权利意识的觉醒、我国法治水平的提升之下进行的,总体看来符合积极、民主、科学的立法要求。但针对刑法修正案的内容,刑法学界存在诸多质疑,如罪名的虚置化、刑法的规范取代、损害刑法的安定性、过度消耗司法资源等,有必要予以回应,以巩固刑法修订的正当性。为确保刑法修订以及适用的方向正确,应坚持普遍性、可行性与必要性标准、罪名类型化原则以及及时更新相应的司法解释以配套刑法的适用。The revision of my country’s criminal law is carried out under the background of active legislation,the awakening of national rights awareness,and the improvement of the level of the rule of law in our country.Generally speaking,it meets the requirements of active,democratic and scientific legislation.However,there are many doubts in the criminal law community regarding the content of the criminal law amendment,such as the false accusation,the replacement of criminal law norms,the damage to the stability of the criminal law,and the excessive consumption of judicial resources.It is necessary to respond to strengthen the legitimacy of the amendment.In order to ensure that the criminal law is revised and applied in the correct direction,it is necessary to adhere to the universality,feasibility and necessity standards,the principle of categorization of crimes,and timely update the corresponding judicial interpretations to support the application of the criminal law.

关 键 词：刑法修正案 积极立法 民主立法 科学立法 司法解释 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]