检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈忻昕 SHEN Xin-xin(School of Public Administration,Dongbei University of Finance and Economics,Dalian Liaoning 116025;Institute for Urban Development,Liaoning Academy of Social Science,Shenyang Liaoning 110081)
机构地区:[1]东北财经大学公共管理学院,辽宁大连116025 [2]辽宁社会科学院城市发展研究所,辽宁沈阳110081
出 处:《新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2022年第1期116-128,共13页Journal of Xinjiang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家自然科学基金重点项目(71731007)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:文本以2004-2018年我国227个地级城市数据为依据,在证实我国地方政府环境竞争存在"逐底"与"逐顶"策略分化的基础上,分析环保问责制度、地方官员晋升预期对地方政府环境策略选择的影响。结论表明:我国地方政府间的环境竞争策略依然以"逐底"竞争为主,但东、中、西部地区政府已经出现显著的环境策略分化,具体表现为西部省份依然"逐底"与东部省份渐次"逐顶"。而地方政府环境策略之所以从"逐底"向"逐顶"转移,是官员个体在晋升预期与晋升激励共同作用下的个体选择结果。环保问责等制度的实施,并未导致环境策略发生本质性转变,但能够提升政府"逐底"竞争时的环境规制基准水平。基于此,文本提出相关对策与建议。Based on the data of 227 prefecture level cities in China from 2004 to 2018,and on the basis of confirming the differentiation of “bottom by bottom” and “top by top” strategies in China’s local government environmental competition,this paper analyzes the impact of environmental accountability system and promotion expectation of local officials on the choice of local government environmental strategies.The conclusion shows that the environmental competition strategy among local governments in China is still dominated by “bottom-by-bottom” competition,but there has been a significant differentiation of environmental strategies among governments in East,Middle and West China,which is embodied in the “bottom-by-bottom” in the West and the gradual “top-by-top” in the East.The reason why the local government’s environmental strategy shifts from “bottom by bottom” to “top by top” is actually the result of individual choice of officials under the constraints of individual characteristics,promotion expectation and promotion incentive.The implementation of environmental accountability and other systems does not lead to the essential change of environmental strategy,but can improve the benchmark level of environmental regulation when the government competes “bottom by bottom”.Finally,this paper puts forward relevant suggestions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.235.3