检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄洁[1] 陈露平 HUANG Jie;CHEN Lu-ping(Tan Kee College,Xiamen University,Zhangzhou Fujian 363105,China)
出 处:《齐齐哈尔师范高等专科学校学报》2022年第1期63-65,共3页Journal of Qiqihar Junior Teachers College
摘 要:我国遗失物拾得制度涉及道德法律化、权利义务是否一致、遗失物是否完全适用善意取得等一系列问题。通过对拾得遗失物进行界定和对我国遗失物拾得制度的形成背景进行探索,明确我国遗失物拾得制度不仅受苏联民法的影响,还受道德的影响,对公众有着极高的道德要求。因此有必要进一步探究我国遗失物拾得制度的缺陷,对照域外遗失物拾得制度,结合我国实际情况对我国遗失物拾得制度进行完善。China's system of lost property collection involves a series of issues such as ethical legalization,consistency of rights and obligations,and whether the lost property is fully applicable to good faith.Through the definition of the lost objects and the background of the formation of the lost property collection system in China,it is clear that the system of lost property in China is not only affected by the Soviet civil law,but also influenced by morality and has high moral requirements for the public.Therefore,although China's lost property collection system makes the relevant cases law-abiding,there are many doubts.Therefore,we will further explore the defects of China's lost property collection system,and improve the system of lost property collection in China in light of the actual situation of China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.233