检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨晓华[1] 许卉艳[1] YANG Xiaohua;XU Huiyan
机构地区:[1]中国矿业大学(北京)文法学院,北京100083
出 处:《外语与外语教学》2022年第1期84-94,149,150,共13页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基 金:全国高校外语教学科研项目“二语写作课堂中组内合作的特点及模式研究”(项目编号:2017BJ0010A)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:本文探讨了导图预写策略训练对英语学习者同伴书面反馈的影响。研究以92名非英语专业学生为实验对象,比较了实验组和对照组在前后测试中的同伴书面反馈和反馈引起的修改,并通过对实验组半结构访谈验证该策略训练带来的反馈变化。研究发现:后测中实验组的内容和结构反馈数量比对照组有较大提高,内容和结构修改质量也显著高于对照组。同时访谈结果表明:实验组对同伴反馈持积极态度,导图成为该组反馈时的重要依据。因此,大学英语写作课程中实施导图预写策略训练,有助于强化学生的高层级问题意识,提高其书面反馈质量。This study investigates the effectiveness of mapping as a prewriting strategy training for subsequent peer written feedback from English learners.Ninety-two non-English majors participated in the experiment,and a pretest-posttest design was adopted to compare the peer written feedback produced and the feedback-induced revisions from both the experimental and the control groups.Semi-structured interviews with the experimental group were also conducted to verify the impact of this strategy training on peer written feedback.Findings showed that compared with the control group,the experimental group not only provided more content and organization feedbacks but also made significantly higher quality revisions in content and organization.Meanwhile,findings of the interviews revealed that the experimental group was more positive towards peer feedback and tended to take peers’map as an important guide for providing feedback.Therefore,it is concluded that mapping as a prewriting strategy training in college English writing courses is conducive to reinforcing students’awareness of high-ordered issues,and improving the quality of their written feedback.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15