新古典经济学效用—价格理论批判  

Utility of Neoclassical Economics:Criticism of Price Theory

作　　者：杨春生 YANG Chunsheng(Department of Economics and Management,Sanlian University,Hefei,Anhui 230601,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽三联学院经济管理学院,安徽合肥230601

出　　处：《宜宾学院学报》2022年第4期1-9,共9页Journal of Yibin University

基　　金：2016年安徽省人文社会科学研究重大项目(sk2016sd27)。

摘　　要：价格决定理论是微观经济学的核心和基础。在新古典经济学的价格决定理论中,效用—价格论的影响最为深远。通过对效用—价格理论的发展过程进行梳理可以发现,无论是基数效用论、序数效用论还是希克斯—艾伦的偏好理论,新古典价格理论没有解决效用的测度性问题和货币边际效用不变问题,甚至犯了更为严重的逻辑错误,以至于最终偷换了概念,将价格决定理论变成了需求量怎样随价格的变动而变化的需求理论。以萨缪尔森为代表的新古典综合派,不仅全面接受了希克斯对价格理论根本任务和目标的篡改,还违反了奥卡姆剃刀原则,使效用成为价格理论中的一个多余向量。由此可见,所谓的“主流”经济学是没有理论基础的伪科学。Price determination theory is the core and foundation of microeconomics. In the price determination theory of neoclassical economics, the utility-price theory has the most profound influence. By combing through the development process of utility-price theory, it can be found that whether it is cardinal utility theory, ordinal utility theory, or Hicks-Allen’s preference theory, neoclassical price theory does not solve the problem of the measurement of utility and the unchangeable marginal utility of money. At the same time, even more serious mistakes were made, so that the concept was eventually disguised and the theory of price determination became the demand theory of how demand changed with the change of price. The neoclassical synthesis represented by Samuelson not only fully accepted Hicks’ s tampering with the fundamental tasks and goals of price theory, but also violated Occam’s razor principle, making utility an redundant vector in price theory. It can thus be seen that the neoclassical economics, so-called “mainstream” economics is a pseudo-science with no theoretical basis.

关 键 词：价格理论 基数效用论 序数效用论 偏好理论 奥卡姆剃刀 

分 类 号：F016[经济管理—政治经济学]