“我思故我在”还是“我在故我思”?--经典人工智能的哲学隐喻及其具身现象学反思  

“I think;therefore,I am”or“I am;therefore,I think”?--The Limit of Classical Artificial Intelligence and Reflection on Embodied Phenomenology

作　　者：刘伟 LIU Wei(School of Marxism,Beijing University of Technology,Beijing 100124,China)

机构地区：[1]北京工业大学马克思主义学院,北京100124

出　　处：《河北学刊》2022年第3期53-58,共6页Hebei Academic Journal

基　　金：2021年度北京市社会科学基金项目“具身现象学视域下人工智能范式转型研究”(21ZXC008)。

摘　　要：传统形而上学与经典人工智能关系密切,经典人工智能是传统形而上学的遗产在计算机科学领域的具体实践。因此,如果传统形而上学在对人类心智的理解上存在问题的话,那么在传统形而上学框架下建构的经典人工智能也必然存在同质性的困境。现象学在批判传统形而上学的基础上,实现了人类认知思维的重大转向。基于传统形而上学和人工智能的同质性困境,我们期望可以从现象学对传统形而上学的批判中,为人工智能的发展寻找新的“阿基米德支点”,使人类向着真正理解和模拟自然智能的目标更进一步。Traditional metaphysics and classical artificial intelligence are closely related.Classical artifi⁃cial intelligence is the heritage of traditional metaphysics and the concrete practice in the field of comput⁃er science.Therefore,if the traditional metaphysics has problems in the understanding of human mind,then the classical artificial intelligence constructed in the framework of traditional metaphysics will inevi⁃tably have the dilemma of homogeneity.On the basis of criticizing traditional metaphysics,phenomenolo⁃gy has realized a significant turn of human cognitive thinking.Based on the homogeneity dilemma of tra⁃ditional metaphysics and artificial intelligence,we hope to find a new‘Archimedean point’for the devel⁃opment of artificial intelligence from the criticism of phenomenology to metaphysics,so as to make human go further towards the goal of truly understanding and simulating natural intelligence.

关 键 词：“具身现象学” 人工智能 形而上学 表征化 

分 类 号：B80[哲学宗教—思维科学] C02[社会学]