困境与破解:程序性辩护实证研究  

Dilemmas and Solutions:An Empirical Study of Procedural Defense

作　　者：林佳嘉 LIN Jiajia(Law School,Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan,China610207)

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610207

出　　处：《昆明学院学报》2022年第2期41-49,共9页Journal of Kunming University

摘　　要：实证研究发现,程序性辩护主要面临三大问题:一是非法证据排除提出难、启动难、排除难;二是程序性辩护被滥用、审前程序性辩护被忽略;三是实体性辩护与程序性辩护主次把握不清。因此,为进一步完善程序性辩护制度,文章提出相应的建议:一是立法上完善非法证据排除规则;二是辩护律师在不同诉讼阶段和诉讼程序中把握辩护重点;三是围绕非法证据排除规则和发回重审制度采取有效的辩护策略;四是司法上应加大对程序性辩护意见的回应。Empirical research shows that procedural defense is faced with three main problems.First,it is difficult to put forward,start and eliminate illegal evidence.Second,procedural defense is abused and the procedural defense before trial is ignored.Third,substantive defense and procedural defense of the primary and secondary grasp is unclear.Therefore,in order to further improve the procedural defense system,the corresponding suggestions are put forward.First,the illegal evidence exclusion rules will be perfected in legislation.Second,defense lawyers in different stages and procedures will grasp the focus of defense.Third,effective defense strategy will be adopted around the exclusions rule of illegal evidence and remand system.Fourth,judicial response to procedural defense opinion will be strengthened.

关 键 词：程序性辩护 非法证据排除 发回重审 辩护重点 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]