检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石松鑫 王大力 李弘 王星稳 訾媛 安雅臣 张江 SHI Songxin;WANG Dali;LI Hong;WANG Xingwen;ZI Yuan;AN Yachen;ZHANG Jiang(Department of Neurology,North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital,Tangshan 063000,China;Neuro-intensive Care Unit,North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital,Tangshan 063000,China;CT Room,North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital,Tangshan 063000,China;Department of Nuclear Medicine,North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital,Tangshan 063000,China)
机构地区:[1]华北理工大学附属医院神经内科,唐山063000 [2]华北理工大学附属医院神经重症医学科,唐山063000 [3]华北理工大学附属医院CT室,唐山063000 [4]华北理工大学附属医院核医学科,唐山063000
出 处:《中国卒中杂志》2022年第4期341-345,共5页Chinese Journal of Stroke
摘 要:目的比较血管性帕金森综合征(vascular parkinsonism,VaP)和帕金森病(Parkinson’s disease,PD)患者的认知功能特点。方法回顾性纳入2018年1月-2020年12月于华北理工大学附属医院首次就诊的VaP患者和PD患者。采用MMSE和MoCA量表评估PD患者和VaP患者的认知功能状态,统一帕金森病评定量表第3部分(unified Parkinson’s disease rating scaleⅢ,UPDRSⅢ)评定患者的运动功能。比较2组临床资料和上述量表评分的差异。以MoCA<26分为认知障碍的标准,比较VaP合并认知障碍(VaP with cognition impairment,VPCI)亚组与PD合并认知障碍(PD with cognition impairment,PDCI)亚组间上述指标的差异。结果共纳入VaP组19例,PD组22例患者。VaP组高血压(78.9%vs.40.9%,P=0.014)、糖尿病(52.6%vs.22.7%,P=0.047)及脑白质病变(84.2%vs.36.4%,P=0.002)的发生率高于PD组,而PD组的高同型半胱氨酸血症发生率高于VaP组(72.7%vs.36.8%,P=0.021);VaP组的认知障碍发生率高于PD组(78.9%vs.45.5%,P=0.028),MMSE(中位数:24.0分vs.29.0分,P<0.001)、MoCA(中位数:17.0分vs.26.0分,P=0.002)和UPDRSⅢ(中位数:18.0分vs.33.5分,P<0.001)评分低于PD组。VPCI患者的MMSE(中位数:23.0分vs.27.0分,P=0.002)、MoCA(中位数:17.0分vs.22.0分,P=0.041)和UPDRSⅢ(中位数:18.0分vs.37.0分,P=0.004)评分均低于PDCI患者。结论与PD患者相比,VaP患者中合并认知功能障碍的比例更高,而且VaP患者的认知功能障碍较PD患者严重。Objective To compare the cognitive function between the patients with vascular parkinsonism(VaP)and Parkinson’s disease(PD).Methods PD patients and VaP patients who were firstly admitted in North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were enrolled in the retrospective study.MMSE and MoCA were used to evaluate the patients’cognitive function,and the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale partⅢ(UPDRSⅢ)was used to evaluate the motor function.The scores of MMSE,MoCA,UPDRSⅢand baseline characteristics between PD patients and VaP patients were compared.Cognitive impairment was defined as MoCA<26.The differences in the above scores between VaP patients with cognition impairment(VPCI)and PD patients with cognition impairment(PDCI)were compared.Results A total of 19 VaP patients and 22 PD patients were enrolled in this study.VaP patients had higher incidence of hypertension(78.9%vs.40.9%,P=0.014),diabetes(52.6%vs.22.7%,P=0.047)and leukodystrophy(84.2%vs.36.4%,P=0.002)than PD patients,while PD patients had higher incidence of hyperhomocysteinemia than VaP patients(72.7%vs.36.8%,P=0.021);VaP patients had higher incidence of cognitive impairment(78.9%vs.45.5%,P=0.028)and lower scores of MMSE(24.0 vs.29.0,P<0.001),MoCA(17.0 vs.26.0,P=0.002)and UPDRSⅢ(18.0 vs.33.5,P<0.001)than PD patients.VPCI patients had lower scores of MMSE(23.0 vs.27.0,P=0.002),MoCA(17.0 vs.22.0,P=0.041)and UPDRSⅢ(18.0 vs.37.0,P=0.004)than PDCI patients.Conclusions VaP patients had higher incidence of cognition impairment and more severer cognition impairment than PD patients.
分 类 号:R742.5[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28