检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈文曲[1] 张舒婷 CHEN Wen-qu;ZHANG Shu-ting(Central South University,Changsha 410083,China)
出 处:《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第1期75-81,共7页Journal of University of South China(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:在我国打造共建共治共享的社会治理格局背景下,诉讼不仅承载纠纷解决功能而且还发挥着诉讼社会治理功能。慎讼观念是我国现代社会治理理论和社会治理经验总结发展的产物,其建立能够促进诉讼发挥现有积极功能的同时争取突破藩篱,实现整体性超越。它是以传统厌讼观念的更新为前提,在正确认识现代纠纷和纠纷解决机制基础上,形成的既不厌讼又不好讼的全面理性诉讼观。慎讼观的有效形成,需在共建共治共享的社会治理思想原则下,坚持共同协商的精神内核。In the context of building a social governance pattern of co-construction,co-governance and sharing in China,litigation not only carries the function of dispute resolution,but also needs to play the role of social governance of litigation.The concept of prudent litigation is the product of the summary and development of modern social governance theory and social governance experience in our country.Its establishment can promote the existing positive functions of litigation while striving to break through barriers and achieve overall transcendence.It is based on the premise of updating the traditional concept of litigation-weariness,and based on the correct understanding of modern disputes and dispute resolution mechanisms,it has formed a comprehensive and rational litigation concept that is neither tiresome nor litigation-friendly.The effective formation of the cautious view of litigation requires that the spiritual core of mutual consultation must be adhered to under the principle of social governance of co-construction,co-governance and sharing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.222.1