检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕钊进 朱安新[1] 邱月 Lyu Zhaojin;Zhu Anxin;Qiu Yue(School of Social and Behavioral Sciences,Nanjing University)
机构地区:[1]南京大学社会学院
出 处:《开放时代》2022年第2期167-177,M0007,共12页Open Times
基 金:2019年南京大学本科生国际科考科研训练项目“中国人在日本的社会适应与社会融入状况调查”(项目编号:145041)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:全球化时代跨国移民的“超级多样性”使得以“群体主义”为前提的同化-多元化二元论失去了其对流动的、多样化的移民身份认同的解释力。本文受边界建构范式的启发,以东京池袋华侨经营者为研究对象,探讨移民如何在不同关系情境下利用各种象征符号建构自我认同的边界。研究发现,虽然华侨经营者都明确地认同中国人身份,但该身份在不同情境下的显著度有差异。只有在亲密朋友关系中,以族群性为基础的国族认同才是划分自我/他者的核心标准;而在家庭关系、工作伙伴关系和陌生人关系中,行动者遵循其他叙事逻辑来构建个人认同。本研究是一个文化社会学的实践,旨在对同化-多元化二元论进行批判性继承。The“super-diversity”in transnational immigration in the era of globalization renders the“assimilation vs. diversification”dualism premised on“groupism”inadequate in explaining the identities of the mobile and diverse immigrants. Inspired by the boundary construction paradigm, this paper takes the Chinese business operators in Ikebukuro, Tokyo as the object of study to explore how immigrants use various symbols to construct the boundary of self-identity in different relational contexts. Our study found that although Chinese people clearly identify themselves as Chinese, the significance of this identity varies in different contexts. Only in the circle of close friends is ethnically-based national identity the core criterion dividing in-group and out-group. In the circles of family, co-workers, and strangers, people follow other logic to construct personal identity. This study may be considered a practice in cultural sociology aiming to provide a critical reflection on the “assimilation vs. diversification” dualism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229