检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张轶骁 ZHANG Yixiao(School of Liberal Arts,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出 处:《郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版)》2022年第2期69-74,共6页Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:传统吟诵与当代古典诗词吟唱并非语言本位与音乐本位的差异,实为一段先仿其“形”,再求其“神”的过程,此过程依然沿袭了传统吟诵依字行腔、曼引其声的特点,这与流行的古风歌曲、诗词歌曲有着明确的区分,与传统吟诵却是一脉相承的。当代研习者应在尊重传统的基础之上,根据不同的场景需要,选择最适合的呈现方式,以求得最好的研习效果。Classical poetry’s modern chant is a variant of its traditional intoning, rather than being totally different from it. Some previous studies argue that the former works for music, while the latter serves the purpose of language. In fact, modern chant during its development imitates the form of traditional intoning first and then absorbs its essence. Besides, it still keeps some characteristics of traditional intoning, like reading loud poems according to the tone of each character and with a slow rhythm, which distinguish modern chant from ancient-fashioned songs and those using poetry as lyrics. If chanters want to achieve a better performance, they should comply with the rules of traditional intoning and select manners suitable for numerous scenarios.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.26