C9高校与常青藤联盟科研绩效及一流学科比较研究——基于ESI和InCites数据库  

A Comparative Study of Scientific Research Performance and First-class Disciplines between C9 Universities and the Ivy League:Based on ESI and InCites Database

作　　者：黄民理 段雪茹 李英远 HUANG Minli;DUAN Xueru;LI Yingyuan

机构地区：[1]桂林理工大学图书馆,广西桂林541004 [2]河北大学,河北保定071002

出　　处：《图书情报导刊》2022年第3期56-64,共9页Journal of Library and Information Science

摘　　要：通过ESI数据库分析了C9高校与常青藤联盟的ESI排名以及进入ESI前1%的学科,通过InCites数据库从论文数量、论文质量、科研影响力3个维度衡量了两个联盟的科研实力,并从整体角度分析了优势学科结构分布及潜力学科发展趋势。结果表明:C9高校的论文数量已超过常青藤联盟,但论文质量和科研影响力与常青藤联盟仍有较大差距;化学、材料科学和工程学是C9高校的优势学科,但在临床医学、分子生物学和遗传学、空间科学等学科则远远落后于常青藤联盟;C9高校有5个学科与ESI前1%的接近度超过了100%,具有较大的发展潜力。This paper analyzes the ESI rankings of C9 universities and the Ivy League and the top 1% of the disciplines in the ESI through the ESI database,and by using the InCites database, measures the scientific research of the two alliances from the three dimensions of the number of papers,the quality of the papers,and the research influence strength,and analyzes the distribution of dominant disciplines and the development trend of potential disciplines from an overall perspective. The results show that the number of papers in C9 universities has surpassed the Ivy League,but there is still a big gap between the quality of papers and scientific research influence of the Ivy League. Chemistry,materials science and engineering are the dominant disciplines of C9 universities,but they lag far behind the Ivy League in clinical medicine,molecular biology and genetics,and space science. 5 disciplines in C9 universities are more than 100% close to the top 1% of ESI,and have great development potential.

关 键 词：科研绩效评估 一流学科 C9高校 常青藤联盟 

分 类 号：G250.252[文化科学—图书馆学]