检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张磊[1] 任淑芳 ZHANG Lei;REN Shufang(Emergency Department,Pingdingshan First People's Hospital,Pingdingshan 467000,China)
机构地区:[1]平顶山市第一人民医院急诊医学科,河南平顶山467000
出 处:《临床医学工程》2022年第5期663-664,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
摘 要:目的对比间苯三酚注射液与山莨菪碱注射液治疗急诊老年痉挛性腹痛的临床效果。方法选取2020年2月至2021年2月我院急诊科收治的90例老年痉挛性腹痛患者,依据治疗方法不同分为A组(n=45,采用间苯三酚注射液治疗)和B组(n=45,采用山莨菪碱注射液治疗)。比较两组患者的腹痛消失时间、疼痛程度、临床疗效及不良反应发生情况。结果A组的腹痛消失时间短于B组,VAS评分低于B组(P<0.05)。A组的治疗总有效率为97.78%,高于B组的84.44%(P<0.05)。A组的不良反应发生率为2.22%,低于B组的17.78%(P<0.05)。结论与山莨菪碱注射液相比,间苯三酚注射液治疗急诊老年痉挛性腹痛的临床效果更佳,安全性更高,值得临床推广应用。Objective To compare the clinical effects of phloroglucinol injection and anisodamine injection in the treatment of emergency elderly spastic abdominal pain.Methods 90 elderly patients with spastic abdominal pain admitted to our Emergency Department from February 2020 to February 2021 were selected and divided into group A(n=45,phloroglucinol injection)and group B(n=45,anisodamine injection)according to different treatment methods.The disappearance time of abdominal pain,pain degree,clinical efficacy and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The disappearance time of abdominal pain in group A was shorter than that in group B,and the VAS score was lower than that in group B(P<0.05).The total effective rate of treatment in group A was 97.78%,higher than 84.44% in group B(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in group A was 2.22%,lower than 17.78% in group B(P<0.05).Conclusions Compared with anisodamine injection,phloroglucinol injection has better clinical effect and higher safety in the treatment of emergency elderly spastic abdominal pain,which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46