检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹玉佳 CAO Yu-jia(Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210000,China)
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学教师教育学院,江苏南京210000
出 处:《黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报》2022年第3期87-92,共6页Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering
摘 要:人工智能与大数据的不断发展,使得算法推荐凭借精准推送信息的优势成为传播思想政治教育的可用渠道。然而,算法推荐在为思想政治教育提供拓宽话语空间、延伸价值引领等机遇的同时,也给思想政治教育带来了算法裹挟的“资本逻辑”冲击思想政治教育话语地位、算法赋权的“网络文化”消解思想政治教育内容认同、算法定制的“圈层结构”弱化思想政治教育价值凝聚等挑战。对此,必须优化算法生态,营造清朗空间;规范算法运行,界定行为边界;主动拥抱算法,促进算法转型。With the continuous development of artificial intelligence and big data,algorithm recommendation has become an available channel for spreading ideological and political education by virtue of the advantage of accurately pushing information.However,algorithm recommendation not only provides opportunities for ideological and political education to broaden discourse space and extend value guidance,it also brings the impact of“capital logic”coerced by algorithm on the discourse status of Ideological and political education,“Network culture”of algorithmic empowerment dispels the identity of Ideological and political education content,the“circle structure”customized by the algorithm weakens the challenge to the value cohesion of Ideological and political education.In this regard,we must optimize the algorithm ecology and create a clear space;Standardize the operation of the algorithm and define the behavior boundary;actively embrace algorithms and promote algorithm transformation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7