检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘明广[1] 李高扬[2] LIU Mingguang;LI Gaoyang(School of Politics and Public Administration,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510006,China;College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering,South China Agricultural University,Guangzhou 510642,China)
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学政治与公共管理学院,广州510006 [2]华南农业大学水利与土木工程学院,广州510642
出 处:《科技和产业》2022年第5期8-14,共7页Science Technology and Industry
基 金:广州市哲学社科规划2020年度课题(2020GZGJ59)。
摘 要:基于中国30个省域2011—2019年规模以上工业企业面板数据,采用空间计量模型分析政府科技资助对企业研发投入的直接和空间溢出效应,并进一步探讨企业异质因素的调节作用。结果表明:政府科技资助除了对企业研发投入具有直接正向激励效应外,还具有空间溢出效应;企业规模、技术水平和盈利能力对企业研发投入具有正向影响,而产权性质对企业研发投入具有负向影响;企业规模与技术水平在政府科技资助与企业研发投入间的关系具有正向调节作用,而产权性质在两者间关系不具有显著的调节作用。Based on the panel data of industrial enterprises above designated size from 2011 to 2019 in 30 provinces of China,the direct and spatial spillover effects of government scientific and technological subsidies on enterprises R&D investment is empirically analyzed and the moderating effect of heterogeneous factors is further explored.The results show that government scientific and technological subsidies not only have direct positive incentive effect on enterprises R&D investment,but also have spatial spillover effect.Firm size,technology level and profitability have positive impact on firm R&D investment,while property rights have negative impact on firm R&D investment.Firm size and technology level have positive moderating effect on the relationship between government S&T subsidies and firm R&D investment,while property rights do not have significant moderating effect on the relationship between them.
分 类 号:F061.5[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.60