检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘瑞佳 杨建君[1] Liu Ruijia;Yang Jianjun(School of Management,Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710049)
出 处:《管理评论》2022年第2期112-125,共14页Management Review
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71572139)。
摘 要:企业对竞合战略内涵与矛盾性质的不同解读,将在企业间技术转移过程中带来不同的竞合战略实施思路。本文分别从辩证思维和悖论思维的理论视角出发,探讨不同思维逻辑下的竞合战略对企业间技术转移的不同解释。基于国内279家制造业企业的问卷数据,实证结果显示,两种思维下的竞合均对企业间技术转移有显著的正向影响。由竞合矛盾产生的建设性冲突对悖论思维下的竞合与技术转移间的关系具有正向的调节作用,却不利于辩证思维下的竞合与技术转移间的关系。而在此情境下,企业间的强关系可以削弱建设性冲突对辩证思维下竞合主效应的负向影响,同时,弱关系可以进一步促进建设性冲突对悖论思维下竞合主效应的正向影响。For coopetition strategy,different interpretations of its concept and contradiction nature bring different implementation ways in the inter-firm technology transfer process.Based on the theoretical perspectives of dialectics and paradox,this paper explores the diverse interpretations of coopetition strategy on inter-firm technology transfer under different logics.An empirical analysis based on questionnaire data of 279 manufacturing enterprises in China shows that coopetition strategy of the two logics both have significant positive impact on technology transfer between enterprises.The constructive conflict caused by coopetitive contradiction has a positive moderating effect on the relation between coopetition and technology transfer under paradoxical logic,but is not conducive to the relation under dialectical logic.In this context,the strong tie between firms can weaken the negative impact of constructive conflict on the main effect of coopetition under dialectical logic.Meanwhile,weak tie can further promote the positive effect of constructive conflict on the main effect of coopetition under paradoxical logic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170