拓跋氏“代王”号兴废考论  

A Textual Research on the Rise and Fall of the Tuoba’s “King of Dai” Title

作　　者：郭硕[1] GUO Shuo(College of History and Culture,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610065,China)

机构地区：[1]四川大学历史文化学院,四川成都610065

出　　处：《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第3期89-99,共11页Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目“北魏时代的名号变迁与国家社会转型研究”(19FZSB032)。

摘　　要：拓跋氏“代王”号的兴废,要比《资治通鉴》等史料所见的情况远为复杂。综合比对《魏书》以及《宋书》《南齐书》《晋书》等书的相关史料,可知猗卢死后“代王”号一度被拓跋氏废置,在臣服石赵的背景下拓跋氏还可能使用过“上洛公”这一与“代王”性质类似的称号。“代王”废置背后的史事之所以不见于《魏书》,是由于与北朝的正统观不相符合而被北魏史官删芟。其后“代王”号的恢复,当在石赵政权覆灭以后。正确解读《魏书》所记北魏早期史事,只有准确把握《魏书》书法并将史事置于十六国的大背景中才能明晰。The evolution of the“King of Dai”title of the Tuoba was more complicated than the records in the Comprehensive Mirror for Aid in Government.From sources such as Book of Wei,Book of Song,Book of Southern Qi,and Book of Jin,the“King of Dai”title had been abandoned after Yilu’s death.Because of the submission to the later Zhao regime(319-351),another title,“Shangluo Gong”was used.Regrettably,the history has been falsified for various reasons.Therefore,we shall look at the historical materials in a comprehensive way.

关 键 词：拓跋 代王 上洛公 《魏书》 正统 书法 

分 类 号：K235[历史地理—历史学]