论既判力视角下我国第三人撤销之诉之适格原告  

On the Proper Plaintiff of China’s Suit of the Third Party under the Perspective of Res Judicata

作　　者：陈洪兵 Chen Hongbing(Engineering Materials Branch of CCCC Third Harbour Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai 200120)

机构地区：[1]中交三航局工程物资有限公司,上海200120

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2022年第1期46-53,共8页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

摘　　要：判决既判力理论在实现判决的公平正义,保障当事人权利的终极实现,促进纠纷解决的经济性、一致性方面经受了各国长期司法实践的检验。无论是从民事诉讼理论界的一贯主张还是从司法实务界的实践动向来看,它被吸收进我国民事诉讼法已是大势所趋。然而,第三人撤销之诉与既判力相对性原则却有着先天的难以调和之处,因此在既判力理论逐渐进入我国成文法的背景下,在其理论框架下对第三人撤销之诉进行重新检视十分必要。总的来说,我国应将第三人撤销之诉的适用范围严格限定在受判决既判力主观范围扩张影响的第三人中。The theory of res judicata has experienced a long-term judicial practice in realizing the fairness and justification of judgments,guaranteeing the ultimate implementation of the rights of the parties,and promoting the economic and consistency of disputes solving.Whether it is from the context of civil litigation theory or from the judicial practice,it has shown a trend of being absorbed into China’s civil procedure law.However,there is an irreconcilable differences between the suit of the third party and the res judicata principle,therefore,it is necessary to re-examined the suit of the third party under its theoretical framework.In general,China should limit the application scope of the suit of the third party.

关 键 词：第三人撤销之诉 既判力 反射效 主观范围扩张 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]