事实行为成就物权变动与法律判断  

Factual Behavior Achieves Change of Real Right and Legal Judgment

作　　者：刘治斌[1] Liu Zhibin

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学人权研究中心、法治学院,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2022年第3期137-147,共11页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：事实行为成就物权变动效力的司法确认,法院行使的是事实行为是否成就物权变动效力的探明权而不是判断权。“事实是否成就”既是一个事实问题,又是一个法律问题,其认定标准究竟应由立法解决,抑或由法官自由心证,在理论上比较容易区分,但在司法判断中则较难清晰界定。法院对因事实行为导致物权变动效力类纠纷的裁判,在保障交易安全、体现“国家干预”的同时,应充分尊重财产权形成的历史传统和现实缘由,从建构资源节约型社会的角度确认事实行为成就的物权变动效力,切实维护权利人的利益。Judicial confirmation of the effect of a factual act on the effect of the change of real right is exercised by the courts to ascertain whether the factual act has achieved the effect of the change of real right, rather than the right to judge;“whether the fact is achieved” is both a factual issue and a legal issue.It is easy to distinguish whether the standard of determination should be resolved by legislation or by the judges’ free judgment in theoretical research, but it is more difficult to clearly define in judicial judgment. The court’s judgment on the effectiveness of real rights changes due to factual behaviors should ensure transaction security and reflect “state intervention” while fully respecting the historical traditions and practical reasons for the formation of property rights, confirming it from the perspective of constructing a resource-saving society The effect of changes in property rights achieved by factual acts effectively safeguards the interests of the right holders.

关 键 词：事实行为 物权变动 法律判断 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]