论我国涉外商事仲裁证据规则的完善  

On the Improvement of Evidence Rules of International Commercial Arbitration in China

作　　者：刘宇[1] 严航 Liu Yu;Yan Hang(College of Law,Anhui University of Finance and Economics,Bengbu 233000,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽财经大学法学院,安徽蚌埠233000

出　　处：《黄山学院学报》2022年第1期68-71,共4页Journal of Huangshan University

基　　金：安徽省高校人文社会科学重点研究项目(SK2019A0520)。

摘　　要：基于涉外商事仲裁证据规则的现状与弊端,需要区分仲裁与诉讼,借鉴域外商事仲裁证据规则完善相关立法,强化证据披露制度,合理限制和分配仲裁员的自由裁量权,以提高涉外商事贸易纠纷的仲裁效率,兼顾公平,服务我国“一带一路”建设与发展。Based on the current situation and disadvantages of evidence rules of international commercial arbitration,it is necessary to distinguish arbitration from litigation,improving legislation with reference to the evidence rules of foreign commercial arbitration,strengthening the system of evidence disclosure,and reasonably restricting and allocating the discretionary power of arbitrators,so as to improve the arbitration efficiency in international commercial trade disputes,balancing efficiency and fairness,and serving the“One Belt,One Road”development and construction in China.

关 键 词：涉外商事仲裁 证据规则 仲裁诉讼化 证据披露义务 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学] D997.4[政治法律—法学]