检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖伟龙 张伏中[1] 邵伟 陈艳香 陈亮[1] XIAO Wei-long;ZHANG Fu-zhong;SHAO Wei;CHEN Yan-xiang;CHEN Liang(Hunan Research Academy of Environmental Science,Changsha 410004,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南省环境保护科学研究院,湖南长沙410004
出 处:《环境生态学》2022年第5期75-78,共4页Environmental Ecology
基 金:《推进完善生态环境保护治理体系加快建设生态强省》(湘财资环指〔2020〕0021号)资助。
摘 要:以湖南省某试点项目为例,分析了EOD模式与传统模式实施方式的差异性,为EOD模式的有效实施提供借鉴。EOD模式与传统模式实施方式在投融资机制方面、组织管理方式、推进路径、环境治理成效等方面存在明显不同,主要表现为:传统模式投融资模式较为单一,主要由政府组织、政府管理运营,环境治理项目通常与城市产业开发分别推进实施,很难跟资产方进行关联并形成投资回报机制,可持续发展能力有限,环境治理效益通常局限于某一个项目。Taking a pilot project in Hunan Province as an example,this paper analyzes the differences between ecology-oriented development(EOD)mode and traditional mode,provides an example for the effective implementation of EOD mode.EOD mode is obviously different from the traditional mode in various aspects,including investment and financing mechanism,environmental governance effectiveness,promotion path,organization and management mode.The main differences are as follows:the traditional mode of investment and financing mode is relatively single,mainly by the government organization,government management and operation,environmental governance projects are usually carried out with urban industrial development respectively,it is difficult to associate with the asset side and form an investment return mechanism,sustainable development ability is limited,environmental governance benefits are usually limited to a project.
分 类 号:X22[环境科学与工程—环境科学] TU984[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117