检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:党振兴 DANG Zhenxing(Minxian People’s Court of Gansu Province,Minxian Gansu,748400,China)
出 处:《西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第3期72-77,共6页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:甘肃省高级人民法院2021年度司法研究课题“人民法院诉源治理及案件繁简分流与分配机制研究”(GSGYKT(2021)B06-1)。
摘 要:简化裁判文书体例和说理是提升诉讼效率、适应小额诉讼程序改革的基本要求。当前,通用的裁判文书格式固化、式样单一、内容繁杂冗长,已无法适应广大人民群众对高效司法的需要,难以与小额诉讼程序完全匹配,束缚了小额诉讼程序改革。简化裁判文书、提高诉讼效率,需要从增强法官的专业能力出发,以信息化建设为依托,在加强说理和法治宣传的同时,对裁判文书的体例结构进行适当简化,创新裁判文书的式样,拓展无裁判文书适用的案件范围,完善当事人司法监督和权利救济渠道,做到程序规范、格式简化、说理透彻、处理得当,从而更好地服务于小额诉讼程序改革,体现法治精神和社会价值。Simplifying the style and reasoning of judgment documents is the basic requirement for improving the efficiency of litigation and adapting to the reform of small claims procedures.The uniform format,rigid style,and complicated and lengthy content in currently used judgment documents cannot fully match the small claims procedure,and restrict the reform of the small claims procedure to meet the public needs for efficient justice.To simplify judgment documents and improve the efficiency of litigation,we need first to enhance the professional ability of judges,and to strengthen reasoning and publicity of the rule of law based on informationization construction.By simplifying and innovating the format and style of judgment documents and expanding the application scope of cases without judgment documents,and by improving the judicial supervision over and relief channels for involved parties,we can ensure standardized procedures,simplified format,thorough reasoning,and proper handling,which better serves the reform of small claims procedure and reflects the spirit of the rule of law and social value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200