进步与局限:《监察法》实施后职务犯罪律师辩护问题研究——以省部级高官为例  

Progress and Limitation:Lawyers’Defense of Duty Crimes after the Implementation of Supervision Law——With Provincial and Ministerial Senior Officials as Examples

作　　者：刘文涛 李光楠 林仲尧 LIU Wen-tao;LI Guang-nan;LIN Zhong-yao(Law School,Sichuan University,Chengdu Sichuan 610207,China;Chengdu Wuhou Commision for Discipline Inspection Supervision Committee,Chengdu Sichuan 610045,China)

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610207 [2]成都市武侯区纪委监委,四川成都610045

出　　处：《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第2期63-71,共9页Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：实证研究表明:我国职务犯罪案件辩护率高,辩护律师业务能力强;阅卷权、会见权保障更为充分;被追诉人更为重视辩护作用。《监察法》实施后,调查阶段律师无法介入案件且介入时间不明确;申请非法证据排除更加困难;同时部分程序性权利不复存在,给律师辩护带来了一定障碍。对此应当明确:律师介入时间为案件移送检察机关之日;辩方具有申请调取录音录像和调查人员出庭作证的权利;同时赋予辩方不当留置救济权等程序性权利。Empirical research has shown that the defense of duty crime cases in China is characterized by high defense rate,competent defense lawyers with operational ability,more adequate guarantee of lawyers’right to read files and meet clients,and more attention paid to the role of defense by the accused.After the implementation of the Supervision Law,lawyers cannot intervene in the case in the investigation stage and the intervention time is not clear after entering the criminal procedure,it is more difficult to apply for the exclusion of illegal evidence,and some procedural rights no longer exist,which brought obstacles to lawyers’defense.In this regard,the following improvements should be made:lawyers’intervention time,should start from the day when the case is transferred to the procuratorial organ,the defense should be given the right to apply for the access to audio and video recordings and apply for investigators to appear in court as witnesses,and the defense should be endowed with such procedural rights as the right to remedy improper lien.

关 键 词：职务犯罪 律师辩护 监察法 监察调查 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]