清初古文《尚书》辨伪与理学的关系——兼议余英时“内在理路说”  

The Relationship between Distinguishing the Ancient Text Shangshu and Neo-Confucianism in the Early Qing:A Conversation on Yu Yingshi’s“Inner Logic”Theory

作　　者：宣燕华 XUAN Yanhua(School of Literature,Shanghai University)

机构地区：[1]上海大学文学院,上海200444

出　　处：《清史研究》2022年第3期89-106,共18页The Qing History Journal

基　　金：中国博士后面上资助项目(2021M702083)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：清初群经辨伪风潮大盛,其中对古文《尚书》的辨伪最为重要。在当时对古文《尚书》真伪公案的大讨论中,如何处置在理学话语中占据“三圣传心”神圣地位的“虞廷十六字”成为一个十分棘手的问题,这也是观察当时经学和理学关系以及学术转型理路的极佳切入点。通过剖析参与此公案的几个最重要的学者如顾炎武、黄宗羲、阎若璩、毛奇龄等对该问题的论说,从实践层面体认当时经学考证风潮中理学的作用和地位,从而加深对这一重要学术转型期的内在肌理的认识,并检验前人关于清学发生的几种典范理论,尤其是对余英时“内在理路说”提出基于实证的驳议。In the early Qing dynasty,there was a great deal of debate about the authenticity of the Confucian classics and the most important debate was over the identification of the ancient text Shangshu.In the debate on the authenticity of the Shangshu,the question of how to deal with the sixteen characters of mind transmission,which occupied a sacred position in Neo-Confucianism,was very complicated.This debate is an excellent entry to observe the path of academic transformation between Ming and Qing dynasties.By analyzing the arguments of some of the most important scholars involved,such as Gu Yanwu,Huang Zongxi,Yan Ruoqu,and Mao Qiling,it is possible to understand the role and status of Neo-Confucianism in classics study at the time,thus deepen our understanding of this important period of academic transition.Study of these debates verifies several paradigmatic theories on the occurrence of Qing scholarship,especially Yu Yingshi’s“inner logic”.

关 键 词：古文《尚书》 虞廷十六字 理学 明清学术转型 内在理路 

分 类 号：K249[历史地理—历史学]