检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹顺庆[1] 王熙靓 CAO Shun-qing;WANG Xi-liang(College of Literature and Journalism,Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610064,China)
出 处:《山西师大学报(社会科学版)》2022年第3期20-28,共9页Journal of Shanxi Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目(19ZDA289)。
摘 要:瘟疫在人类发展的进程中时有爆发,几乎贯穿了整个人类文明发展史。文学作为历史的重要表征,对此有充分反映并留下了丰富的文学作品。然而由于中西文化的异质性,中西文学瘟疫叙事存在着较大差异。本文将从瘟疫母题的叙事流变比较、瘟疫叙事模式比较、瘟疫叙事伦理机制比较这三个角度切入,对中西文学中的瘟疫叙事进行比较研究,并深入探究隐含在差异性背后的中西不同文明机制与文化肌理。Plague broke out from time to time in the process of human development,almost throughout the whole history of human civilization.As an important symbol of history,literature has a full response to this,and has left a wealth of literary works.However,due to the heterogeneity of Chinese and Western cultures,there are great differences in plague narration between Chinese and Western literature.This paper will make a comparative study of the plague narration in Chinese and western literature from three angles:the comparison of the narrative evolution of the plague motif in Chinese and western literature,the comparison of plague narrative modes in Chinese and western literature,and the comparison of the ethical mechanism of plague narration in Chinese and western literature.Finally,it will make in-depth exploration of the different civilization mechanisms and cultural textures behind the differences between China and the West.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.215