马克思对自然与历史关系的实践超越及当代省思--以《德意志意识形态》为主要考本  

Marx's Practical Transcendence on Relationship between Nature and History and Contemporary Reflec-tion--Taking The German Ideology as the Main Examination Text

作　　者：张慧 李军[2] Zhang Hui;Li Jun

机构地区：[1]新疆师范大学马克思主义学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830049 [2]新疆大学法学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830049

出　　处：《新疆社会科学》2022年第3期15-23,178,共10页Social Sciences in Xinjiang

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“恐怖主义犯罪的立法与司法研究”(18BFX090)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：自然与历史的关系问题是西方近代哲学研究的重要主题。马克思和恩格斯在《德意志意识形态》中对青年黑格尔派和费尔巴哈割裂自然与历史关系的做法进行批判,廓清与以往一切唯心主义历史观与人本主义历史观的理论界限,将“现实的个人”视作自然与历史联结的逻辑起点,重视实践联结自然与历史的中介作用,践履自然与历史的辩证统一。发现历史中的自然,对于审度现代资本主义社会因漠视人与自然、自然与历史的统一关系引发的生态危机,探赜指导中国特色社会主义生态文明建设的实践进路具有重要意义。The question of the relationship between nature and history is an important theme in modern western philosophical studies.In The German Ideology,Marx and Engels criticize the prac-tice of the young Hegelians and Feuerbach in separating the relationship between nature and histo-ry,clarify the theoretical boundaries with all previous idealist and humanist views of history,regard the"real individual"as the logical starting point of the connection between nature and history,at-tach importance to the role of practice in linking nature and history,and practice the intermediary role of nature and history.The discovery of nature in history is important for examining the ecologi-cal crisis caused by the disregard for the unified relationship between human beings and nature,na-ture and history in modern capitalist society,and for exploring the practical way forward to guide the construction of socialist ecological civilization with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：自然 历史 实践 《德意志意识形态》 生态文明 

分 类 号：B5[哲学宗教—外国哲学]