行政赔偿诉讼中的事实推定:前提、价值和规则——基于对指导案例91号的观察  

Factual Presumption in Administrative Compensation Litigation:Premise,Value and Rules——Based on the Observation of Guiding Case No.91

作　　者：徐疆 XU Jiang(Law School of Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100081;School of Law,Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics,Urumqi 830012)

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学法学院,北京100081 [2]新疆财经大学法学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830012

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2022年第3期167-176,共10页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

基　　金：新疆维吾尔自治区社科基金一般项目“依法治疆背景下新疆多民族城市社区‘共建共治共享’社会治理研究”(项目编号:20BFX072)的研究成果。

摘　　要：指导案例91号确立了行政赔偿诉讼中房屋内物品损失的事实推定裁判规则。运用法教义学的方法,把指导性案例作为具有规范性的文本,进行法律评注式的考察。司法实践中,存在对指导案例91号涉及的事实推定本质、证明责任分配、利益平衡考量、审理程序环节、说理论证负担和类比参照应用等要点把握不足的问题。为统一法律适用和同案同判,有必要在解释论上厘定指导案例91号的规范属性、适用条件及法律方法。Guiding Case No.91 establishes the factual presumption judgement rules about the property damage in the house in administrative compensation litigation.Using the method of dogmatics of law,this paper regards the guiding case as a normative text and analyses it with legal comments.In the judicial practice,there are problems with insufficient grasp of the essentials about the factual presumption,the burden of proof,the balance of interests,the trial procedures,the burden of explanation,and analogical reference application.In order to unify the application of law and achieve same judgement in the same cases,it is necessary to determine the normative attributes,application conditions,and legal methods of Guiding Case No.91 in terms of the interpretive theory.

关 键 词：行政赔偿 事实推定 裁判规则 类案参照 利益衡量 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]