检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁卫学[1] 韦顺文[1] 李代学 陈达桂[1] 周建红[1] 王占宇[1] LIANG Weixue;WEI Shunwen;LI Daixue;CHEN Dagui;ZHOU Jianhong;WANG Zhanyu(Department of Oncology,Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University/Liuzhou Workers'Hospital,Guangxi Liuzhou 545005,China)
机构地区:[1]广西医科大学第四附属医院/柳州市工人医院肿瘤科,广西柳州545005
出 处:《现代肿瘤医学》2022年第11期2046-2050,共5页Journal of Modern Oncology
基 金:广西卫健委自筹经费科研课题(编号:Z20180503,Z20200421,Z20200503)。
摘 要:目的:应用基于CBCT(cone beam computed tomography)的体表标记点辅助图像配准方法,提高肿瘤放射治疗摆位验证的工作效率。方法:选取胸部、腹部、盆腔共30例肿瘤放疗患者,定位及治疗摆位时体表粘贴标记点。CBCT扫描验证时,医师、主管技师、技师先进行常规图像配准,后采用体表标记点辅助图像配准,以医师常规图像配准为基础分别进行比较。结果:常规图像配准时,主管技师对比医师在胸部、腹部及盆腔部位的X、Y、Z轴上的差异均无统计学意义;技师对比医师在腹部的X、Y、Z轴上及胸部、盆腔部位的X、Y轴上的差异无统计学意义,在胸部及盆腔部位的Z轴上P值分别为0.006,0.014,有显著意义。标记点辅助图像配准时,医师、主管技师及技师对比医师常规图像配准在胸部、腹部及盆腔部位的X、Y、Z轴上的差异均无统计学意义。图像配准的误差发生率腹部大于胸部及盆腔。医师、主管技师、技师分别与自己对比在胸部、腹部及盆腔部位的图像配准完成时间上P值近似于0,有显著意义。结论:以体表标记点辅助图像配准优于常规图像配准,效率高。Objective:To investigate the efficiency improvement of tumor radiotherapy positioning by useing the method of body surface marker assisted image registration based on CBCT was used.Methods:30 patients with chest,abdomen or pelvic tumors were treated with radiotherapy,and the marked points were pasted on their body surface during radiotherapy positioning and treatment setting.Based the CBCT positioning verification,physician,competent technicians and technicians first carried out routine image registration,then used the body surface markers to assist image registration,the results are compared with the routine image registration results of physician individually.Results:There was no significant positional difference in X,Y,Z axis of chest,abdomen and pelvis between competent technician and physician in routine image registration.There was no significant difference in X,Y,Z axis of abdomen and the X,Y axis of chest and pelvic between technicians and physicians in routine image registration,but the P-values on the Z axis of chest and pelvic were 0.006 and 0.014 respectively,which was significant.At the X,Y,Z axis of the chest,abdomen and pelvis,there were no statistically significant differences in physicians,competent technicians,and technicians compared to physicians'routine image registration by using marker-point-assisted image registration.The error proportion of image registration in abdomen was higher than that in the chest and pelvic.Compared physician,competent technician and technicians with themselves,the P-value of the image registration completion time of chest,abdomen and pelvic parts was all close to 0,which was statistically significant.Conclusion:Surface marker assisted image registration is not only better than routine image registration,but also more efficient.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.171.199