红学史不同阶段研究范式及其瓶颈期的突破  

On the Breakthroughs of Different Research Paradigms and Bottleneck Periods in the History of Redology

作　　者：赵建忠[1] ZHAO Jianzhong(School of Literature,Tianjin Normal University,300387,Tianjin,China)

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学文学院,天津300387

出　　处：《北方工业大学学报》2022年第3期60-65,84,共7页Journal of North China University of Technology

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“红学流派批评史论”(13BZW035)。

摘　　要：红学史经历了古代、近现代、当代三个重要阶段:古代红学的评点、索隐均是以《红楼梦》文本为依托的传统解经范式;近现代红学是以王国维引入西方哲学及美学理论评论《红楼梦》为标志;当代红学以李希凡、蓝翎两个“小人物”与俞平伯先生商榷的文章发表为标志;改革开放以来,红学在全球化文化语境下形成了文献研究空前繁荣及文本研究多元化的新格局。红学史不同阶段研究范式都不同程度存在着学术发展中的瓶颈现象,只有突破瓶颈期才能实现《红楼梦》研究的学术增长点。The history of Redology has experienced three important stages:ancient times,modern times,and contemporary times.Ancient Redology s comments and seclusion are all based on the traditional paradigm of interpreting scripture based on the text of A Dream of Red Mansions.Modern Redology is marked by Wang Guowei s comments on A Dream of Red Mansions by introducing western philosophy and aesthetic theory.Contemporary Redology is marked by the publication of articles by,two“nobodies”-li Xifan and Lan Ling-discussing with Mr.Yu Pingbo.Since the reform and opening up,Redology has formed a new diversified pattern of research and text research in the context of globalization.There are bottlenecks in academic development in different research paradigms in the history of Redology.Only by breaking through the bottleneck periods can the academic growth in the study of A Dream of Red Mansions be realized.

关 键 词：《红楼梦》 红学史 研究范式 瓶颈期 

分 类 号：A811[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]