检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭进[1] 詹渭鹏[1] 狐鸣[1] 景武堂[1] 张文涛 马云涛[1] GUO Jin;ZHAN Weipeng;HU Ming;JING Wutang;ZHANG Wentao;MA Yuntao(No.1 Department of General Surgery,Gansu Provincial People’s Hospital,Lanzhou 730000,China)
机构地区:[1]甘肃省人民医院普外一科,甘肃兰州730000
出 处:《机器人外科学杂志(中英文)》2022年第5期406-413,共8页Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery
基 金:甘肃省人民医院院内科研项目(16GSSY2-5)。
摘 要:目的:探讨达芬奇机器人“3+1”模式在进展期远端胃癌根治术中的临床应用效果。方法:回顾性分析甘肃省人民医院于2019年1月—2020年2月收治的72例进展期远端胃癌患者临床资料,按手术方式分为达芬奇机器人“3+1”模式组24例,达芬奇机器人“4+1”模式组20例,腹腔镜手术组28例。对三组患者的淋巴结检出情况、术后资料进行比较。结果:达芬奇机器人“3+1”模式组检出淋巴结数为(23.13±4.18)枚,与达芬奇机器人“4+1”模式组(24.55±5.48)枚及腹腔镜手术组(22.07±5.48)枚(P=0.164)相比无明显差异;达芬奇机器人“3+1”模式组出血量与达芬奇机器人“4+1”模式组和腹腔镜手术组相比无明显差异;三组手术操作时间、术后吻合口或残端漏、术后出血发生率及淋巴漏发生率无统计学差异。达芬奇机器人“3+1”模式组术后48h疼痛评分(0.40±0.16)明显低于达芬奇机器人“4+1”模式组(1.33±0.18)和腹腔镜手术组(1.36±0.20),达芬奇机器人“3+1”模式组术后平均住院时间(9.5±3.5)d,明显少于达芬奇机器人“4+1”模式组(15.4±4.9)d和腹腔镜手术组(16.2±4.8)d,差异具有统计学意义。结论:达芬奇机器人“3+1”在进展期远端胃癌根治术的应用安全可行,可进一步减少创伤,加速术后快速康复,减轻患者经济负担。Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of Da Vinci robotic“3+1”mode in advanced distal gastrectomy.Methods:The clinical data of 72 patients with advanced distal gastric cancer admitted to Gansu Provincial People’s Hospital from January 2019 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.72 patients were divided into three groups,Da Vinci robotic“3+1”mode group(n=24),Da Vinci robotic“4+1”mode group(n=20)and laparoscopic group(n=28).The detection of lymph nodes and postoperative data of the three groups were compared.Results:The number of lymph nodes detected in the“3+1”mode group was(23.13±4.18)per case,which was not significantly different from that in the“4+1”mode group(24.55±5.48)and laparoscopic group(22.07±5.48)(P=0.164).The amount of bleeding was not significantly different among the three groups.No significant difference on operative time,anastomotic leakage or stump leakage,postoperative bleeding and incidence of lymphatic leakage were found among the three groups.The pain score 48 hours after operation in“3+1”mode group(0.40±0.16)was significantly lower than that in“4+1”mode group(1.33±0.18)and laparoscopic group(1.36±0.20).The average postoperative hospital stay of Da Vinci robot“3+1”mode group(9.5±3.5)d was significantly less than that of Da Vinci robot“4+1”mode group(15.4±4.9)d and laparoscopic group(16.2±4.8)d,with significant differences.Conclusion:The application of Da Vinci robotic“3+1”in advanced distal gastrectomy is safe and feasible,which could further reduce trauma,accelerate postoperative recovery and reduce the economic burden of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195