检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭文仪[1] Guo Wenyi
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学国学院
出 处:《国学学刊》2022年第1期109-125,141,142,共19页Research in the Traditions of Chinese Culture
摘 要:自道咸至民初,数代文士都表现出对贞元、元和学术与士风的认同。晚清士人对贞元、元和士人的认同可大致分为三种:道咸至同光中兴时期,主要是对贞元、元和士人士气昌昌的社会责任感的认同;光绪中后期主要体现为对贞元、元和士人所处变革时代的无奈挣扎和政局多变的体认;以及对贞元、元和士人所经历的时代悲剧和个人命运悲剧有了相同的感伤。本文拟从晚清士人对贞元、元和的诗文中梳理他们对这一时期学术、士风不同层次的认同和构建,以及在这一过程中的重构与想象,兼论陈寅恪“中唐枢纽说”学术渊源,或可窥见近代士人心态与学术史之一隅。From Daoguang and Xianfeng years to the beginning of the Republic of China,several generations of intellectuals have shown their identification with the academic and scholarly styles of Zhenyuan and Yuanhe years.Scholars in late Qing Dynasty can be broadly divided into three types of identification with Mid-Tang scholars:from Daoguang period to Mid-Revival of Tongzhi and Guangxu period,mainly with the recognition of the social responsibility of the scholars in Mid-Tang;the middle and late of Guangxu period,the sense of identity is mainly reflected in the helpless struggle and drastic political changes in the Era of Change;and the tragedy of the times and the tragedy of personal fate experienced which scholars in Mid-Tang had the same sentiment.This paper is supposed to sort out the different levels of identification and construction of scholarship and scholarly style in this period,as well as the reconstruction and imagination in this process,from the poems and prose of late Qing scholars.Besides,the paper intends to discusses the academic origin of Chen Yinke’s“Mid-Tang Pivot”,which may provide a glimpse of the mentality of modern scholars and academic history.
分 类 号:I206.2[文学—中国文学] I206.5[历史地理—历史学] K252[历史地理—中国史] K242.3
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7