认罪认罚案件值班律师权利研究  

A Research on the Rights of the Duty Lawyers When the Criminal Suspect Admits Guilt and Accepts Punishment

作　　者：上海市宝山区人民检察院、上海大学法学院联合课题组 郭宗才[2] 洪凌啸 Joint Research Group of Baoshan District People's Procuratorate;Shanghai University Law School(Baoshan District People's Procuratorate,Shanghai 201999;Shanghai University,Shanghai 201999)

机构地区：[1]不详 [2]上海市宝山区人民检察院第六检察部 [3]上海大学法学院

出　　处：《犯罪研究》2022年第1期72-78,共7页Chinese Criminology Review

基　　金：2021年度最高人民检察院检察应用理论研究课题“认罪认罚案件值班律师权利研究”的研究成果。

摘　　要：当下值班律师制度饱受批评的原因是值班律师是一个配合者、“工具人”的作用,实践中值班律师的会见权、阅卷权、在场权、提出意见权等权利虚置,制约了值班律师法律帮助功能的实现。究其原因在于:一是司法机关指派案件的时间与签署具结书的时间过于接近,值班律师没有充分的准备时间;二是没有考虑到值班律师的经济效益;三是值班律师的准入没有充分考虑刑事辩护经验。今后,值班律师的权利设置要立足于有效法律帮助,在认罪认罚从宽程序中的“关键节点”为犯罪嫌疑人、被告人提供法律帮助,使形式上的法律帮助转化为实质意义上的有效帮助。At present, one of the reasons why the duty lawyer system is criticized is that the duty lawyers are mainly playing a collaborative and mechanical role. In practice, a large number of rights such as the right to meet, to consult the case file, to be present and to put forward opinions are made empty, which restricts the full realization of the legal assistance function of the duty lawyers. The reasons behind this phenominon are threefold: first, the assignment of the case by the judicial organs is too close to the signing of the affidavit in the timeline, and the duty lawyers do not have sufficient time to make preparation;second, the provisions on the rights of duty lawyers do not take into account the economic benefits of these lawyers;third, the qualification of duty lawyers does not include the factor of criminal defense experience. From the perspective of effective legal assistance, duty lawyers should provide legal assistance at the "key points" in the lenient procedure of guilt admission and punishment acceptance.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 值班律师 有效法律帮助 刑事辩护全覆盖 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]