检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴桐 王瑞剑 Wu Tong;Wang Rui-jian
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院
出 处:《苏州大学学报(法学版)》2022年第2期32-45,共14页Journal of Soochow University:Law Edition
摘 要:在比较法上,检察一体存在组织原理和司法指令两个发展维度。以法德为代表的大陆法系检察制度和以日本为代表的东亚检察制度,检察一体均经历了“相对去政治化”“司法化转型”“区分检察行政工作与检察司法工作”三个阶段。总结检察一体的源与流可以看出,检察一体是以检察官独立为基础,检察一体与检察官独立的矛盾不表现为上级检察官的个体指令与办案检察官独立地位之间的矛盾,而是办案检察官的独立判断与整体检察官的履职标准之间的矛盾,后者可以通过检察官客观义务和检察职业伦理来予以协调。In comparative law,the procuratorial integration has two development dimensions:organisational principle and procuratorial directive.According to the historical evolution in continental procuratorial system represented by Germany and East-Asian procuratorial system,of which represented by Japan,the procuratorial integration has undergone three phases.It includes relative depoliticisation,judicial transformation and distinguish between procuratorial administration and procuratorial judicature.Based on this,it can be concluded that prosecutorial independence is the foundation of prosecutorial integration,the conflict between procuratorial integration and procuratorial independence should not be manifested as a conflict between the instructions of the superior prosecutor and the independent status of the responsible prosecutor,instead,it should be seen as a conflict between the independent judgment and the overall performance standards of the prosecutor.The latter conflict could be coordinated through the objective obligation and the professional ethic of prosecutors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49