审判中心主义下证人发问规则研究  

On witness examination rules under judgment centralism

作　　者：王一灵 WANG Yi-ling(School of Economic Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学经济法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《沈阳工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第3期282-288,共7页Journal of Shenyang University of Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(19BFX090);上海市大学生创新创业训练计划项目(201910276121)。

摘　　要：推行以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革,对证人发问规则的建构提出了更高要求。制度层面上,我国证人发问规则存在配套制度缺位、逻辑不自洽问题;司法实践中,如何正确认定庭审证言的地位及处理庭审效率与公平的关系,仍未形成统一认识。建议在比较英美法系交叉询问制度与大陆法系发问规则的基础上,对我国交叉询问规则进行本土化调整,提升庭审发问规则逻辑自洽性,增加控辩证人区分,允许有条件的诱导式发问;在发问规则配套制度上,厘清证言笔录与当庭证言的关系,充分发挥庭前会议的分流作用。The implementation of trial-centered litigation institution reform proposed higher requirements of the construction of witness examination rules.At the institutional level,there are problems of witness examination rules in China of the absence of supporting system and the inconsistent logic.In judicial practice,it is not yet formed a unified understanding of how to correctly identify the status of court testimony and deal with the relationship between efficiency and fairness of court.It is suggested that based on comparing the cross-examination institution of common law system and the questioning rules of civil law system,the cross-examination rules in China should be adjusted.The logical self-consistency of court questioning rules should be improved,the distinction between prosecution and defense witnesses should be added,and the conditional induced questioning should be allowed.On the supporting system of questioning rules,the relationship between testimony transcript and testimony in court should be clarified,and the diversion role of pre-trial meeting should be given full play.

关 键 词：审判中心主义 庭审实质化 证人出庭 发问规则 交叉询问 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]