检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜红 Jiang Hong
机构地区:[1]不详
出 处:《国际社会科学杂志(中文版)》2022年第1期154-160,16,共8页International Social Science Journal(Chinese Edition)
摘 要:继其博士论文探讨社群主义对于自由主义的反思之后,加拿大政治哲学家贝淡宁又看到儒家与社群主义之间的很多共通之处,因而对儒学产生浓厚兴趣。他所提出的中国贤能政治模式可以弥补西方民主政治的不足,以及和谐相比于自由的重要性,都在国际学界引起热议。在儒学发展的背景下,需要重新思考儒学的有益价值及其对于当代社会的启示。In the interview, Prof. Daniel A. Bell mentioned again that Confucianism and communitarianism share a lot of things in common, and he is interested in the former for the reason. He suggests that there is a model of meritocracy in China’s politics, which could serve as a remedy to the inadequacies of the democracy in the West. Furthermore, he emphasizes the importance of harmony vis-à-vis freedom. All the arguments have incurred discussions in the world. It is important, as he believes, to reconsider the values of Confucianism and its inspirations for the societies today in the context of development of Confucianism and modernisation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38