检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范卫宏 郭寿良 Fan Weihong;Guo Shouliang
机构地区:[1]西南财经大学党委办公室 [2]西南财经大学会计学院
出 处:《财经科学》2022年第5期105-119,共15页Finance & Economics
摘 要:本文基于2009年以来我国实施的“十大产业振兴规划”构造准自然实验,根据十大战略产业中每个产业与其所涉及的高校一级学科进行匹配,结合教育部第四轮学科评估结果来识别该学科具有A级的高校从而构建处理组,采取双重差分模型对重点产业政策对高校科技创新效率的影响进行检验与分析。本文研究发现,重点产业政策的实施显著提升了我国高校的科技创新效率,进一步研究发现,这种正向影响同时也呈现出高校间和地区性差异。重点产业政策对高校科技创新效率的促进效应在“211高校”和其他高校中更为明显,更多集中在东部和西部地区高校,而对“985高校”以及中部地区高校则没有显著的促进效应。This study conducts a quasi-natural experiment based on the "Ten Industrial Revitalization Plans" of China in 2009.Matching the targeted ten strategic industries with the first-class subjects of universities,we treated universities with A-level subjects involving in targeted ten strategic industries as treatment group.Using a difference-in-difference model,we test and analyze the impact of industrial policies on innovation efficiency of universities.We find that the industrial policies have significantly improved the innovation efficiency of universities.Furthermore,the positive impacts are heterogeneous between universities and regions.The innovation efficiency promotion of industrial policies is more remarkable in "211" universities and other colleges,and more concentrated in universities of eastern region,while there is no significant promotion for "985" and central regional universities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117