论分析马克思主义对马克思正义观的误读性重构  

On Analytical Marxism’s Erroneous Reconstruction of Marx’s View of Justice

作　　者：杜利娜 刘同舫[2] Du Lina;Liu Tongfang

机构地区：[1]宁波大学马克思主义学院,315211 [2]浙江大学马克思主义学院,310058

出　　处：《国外社会科学》2022年第2期87-95,197,共10页Social Sciences Abroad

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“中国共产党对马克思主义正义观的探索历程与独创性贡献研究”(21CKS056)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：分析马克思主义学派在对马克思政治哲学核心范畴进行探讨与重构的过程中,围绕马克思是否拒斥正义概念、是否用正义价值规范评判资本主义制度等议题展开了针锋相对的理论探讨。以正义议题为核心,柯亨、伍德等人以马克思是否建构道德理论体系以及剥削理论是否蕴含规范价值等为各自的理论进路,进一步拓展了研究的深度与广度。分析马克思主义的正义观论争有助于促进马克思正义观研究的深化发展,但争论双方囿于非此即彼的二分法思维和各自的理论预设,形成了马克思资本批判理论与其正义思想之间逻辑断裂的误解。我们必须立足于历史唯物主义立场,克服分析马克思主义重构马克思正义观的方法论缺陷与理论局限,消除其对马克思正义观辩证意蕴的负面影响。In the process of exploring and reconstructing the core categories of Marx’s political philosophy,Analytical Marxism has debated on whether Marx rejected the concept of justice and whether the value norm of justice was used to judge the capitalist system.Focusing on the issue of justice,Analytical Marxism representative scholars further expand the depth and breadth of the justice debate by discussing whether Marx has moral theory and whether the theory of exploitation contains the value of norms;controversy on justice helps promote the deepening of the research on Marx’s justice thought.However,the two sides of the dispute are trapped in either-or dichotomy thinking and their respective theoretical presuppositions,resulting in a misunderstanding of the logical break between Marx’s critical theory of capital and its justice thoughts.To reasonably and properly resolve the internal disputes of Analytical Marxism,it is necessary to stick to the standpoint of historical materialism,overcome and transcend the methodological and theoretical defects of Analytical Marxism.

关 键 词：分析马克思主义 正义观 重构 马克思主义 

分 类 号：B089[哲学宗教—哲学理论]