息肉状脉络膜血管病变的新术语和非基于吲哚菁绿血管造影的诊断标准——2021亚太眼科影像学会专家共识解读与思考  

Interpretation of the consensus on nomenclature and non-indocyanine green angiograph based diagnostic criteria of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy from the Asia-Pacific Ocular Imaging Society in 2021

作　　者：文峰[1] 苏永悦 WEN Feng;SU Yongyue(State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology,Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science,Guangzhou 510060,Guangdong Province,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学中山眼科中心,眼科学国家重点实验室,广东省眼科视觉科学重点实验室,广东省广州市510060

出　　处：《眼科新进展》2022年第6期421-426,共6页Recent Advances in Ophthalmology

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(编号81870674)。

摘　　要：息肉状脉络膜血管病变(PCV)发现之初至今的40年间,其命名和各成分术语随着眼底影像技术的飞速发展不断更迭,部分常用术语已经无法代表PCV病灶的本质;同时,以无创的检查手段诊断PCV的效能越来越受到关注。2021年,亚太眼科影像学会PCV工作组讨论并针对PCV两个重要成分的术语做出专家共识,并提出一套不基于吲哚菁绿眼底血管造影的PCV诊断标准,以期鉴别PCV与典型的新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性。该共识是对影像学和组织学报告的最新理解的凝练,概念明晰且精炼,值得临床推广应用。Over the past 40 years from the discovery of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy(PCV),the fundus imaging technology has developed rapidly,and with the in-depth research,the terminology of PCV components has changed accordingly.Some commonly used terms have been unable to represent the essence of PCV lesions.The efficacy of the noninvasive examination in PCV diagnosis has attracted more and more attention.In 2021,the PCV Workgroup of the Asia-Pacific Ocular Imaging Society discussed and reached a consensus on the nomenclature of the two important components of PCV,and proposed a set of PCV diagnostic criteria not based on indocyanine green angiography to distinguish PCV from typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration.The consensus is an accurate summary of the latest imaging and histological reports,worthy of clinical application.

关 键 词：息肉状脉络膜血管病变 年龄相关性黄斑变性 共识术语 眼底影像 吲哚菁绿血管造影 光学相干断层扫描 

分 类 号：R773.4[医药卫生—眼科]