检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赖流滨[1,2] 张运生 Lai Liubin;Zhang Yunsheng(Business School of Central South University,Changsha 410083,China;School of Economics and Management,Changsha Normal University,Changsha 410148,China)
机构地区:[1]中南大学商学院,湖南长沙410083 [2]长沙师范学院经济管理学院,湖南长沙410148
出 处:《科技进步与对策》2022年第12期20-30,共11页Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71774177);中南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目(2020zzts021)。
摘 要:专利联盟存在竞合现象,联盟成员技术竞合究竟是阻碍创新还是激励创新?着眼于专利联盟成员竞合网络,将技术合作划分为探索式合作和利用式合作,将技术竞争划分为学习型竞争和诉讼型竞争,以2006-2019年MPEG LA公司12个专利联盟的76个成员为研究样本,运用负二项回归实证检验专利联盟成员技术竞合对联盟成员创新绩效的影响。研究发现:探索式合作、利用式合作和学习型竞争有利于成员创新绩效提升,而诉讼型竞争不利于成员创新绩效提升;学习型竞争和诉讼型竞争对双元合作的创新激励效应均具有显著负向调节作用。Owing to the high complexity and ambiguity of modern scientific and technological innovation,no single enterprise can monopolize all the advanced technologies of the industry.Thus,high-tech enterprises have adopted the co-opetition strategy of joining patent pools than"fighting alone";they not only share patents in the pools but also gather the information and expertise needed to create new knowledge.Does co-opetition between pool members encourage or hinder technology innovation?It is crucial to explore the impact of patent pools on enterprise innovation performance.The purpose of this study is to test how co-opetition between pool members affects innovation performance.This paper selects 76 members within 12 patent pools managed by MPEG LA,the world's leading one-stop patent licensing provider with a long history and rich experience in patent pool management.The members of patent pools are research institutions,universities and firms.The information about these pairs was gathered from MPEG LA website,PatSnap Database and Derwent Innovation Index.The research focuses on co-opetition network of pool members,and divides technical collaboration into exploitative collaboration and exploratory collaboration,and technical competition into learning competition and litigation competition.We propose the hypotheses that exploitative collaboration and exploratory collaboration are helpful for innovation performance of pool members;learning competition is positive for innovation performance of pool members while litigation competition plays a negative role;learning competition will weaken innovation motivation effect of exploitative and exploratory collaboration.We verify the above hypotheses by using negative binomial regression to analyze longitudinal data from 76 members within 12 patent pools managed by MPEG LA from 2006 to 2019.The empirical results show that exploratory collaborations,exploitative collaboration and learning competition between pool members have significant positive correlations with innovation perform
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222