检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔冬[1] 于欣 CUI Dong;YU Xin(School of Humanities and Law,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin 150040,China)
出 处:《长春大学学报》2022年第3期65-69,共5页Journal of Changchun University
基 金:黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目(19FXH012,18FXB009)。
摘 要:在证券期货市场领域,基于资本市场追求高效的特性,与行政诉讼制度相比较,证券行政执法和解制度能更有效、更和平、更高效地解决行政执法纠纷,更优质地维护社会效益。自2015年《行政和解试点实施办法》试行以来,行政和解执法制度在证券领域不断实践并卓有成效,该实践证实了证券行政执法和解制度确符合我国“以人为本”的发展理念,更贴合当代社会强监管背景的蕴含之意。In the field of securities and futures market, based on the characteristics of pursuing efficiency of capital market, compared with administrative litigation system, securities administrative law enforcement reconciliation system can solve administrative law enforcement disputes more peacefully and efficiently, and maintain social benefits better. Since the implementation of Administrative Reconciliation Pilot Measures in 2015, the administrative reconciliation law enforcement system has been continuously practiced in the field of securities and some achievements has been got, which proves that the system conforms to the development concept of “people-orientation” in China, and it is in line with the implication of the strong regulatory background in contemporary society.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.184.32