检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴军[1] 巴依勒 郝伟怡 岳利媛 WU Jun;BA Yile;HAO Weiyi;YUE Liyuan(College of Economics and Management,Beijing University of Chemical Techonology,Beijing 100029;Datang Carera(Beijing)Investment Co.Ltd,Beijing 100191)
机构地区:[1]北京化工大学经济管理学院,北京100029 [2]大唐实创(北京)投资有限公司,北京100191
出 处:《系统科学与数学》2022年第4期955-964,共10页Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71372195);北京市社会科学基金一般项目(17GLB014);北京化工大学一流学科建设专项资金资助(XK1802-5);北京化工大学基地项目(G-JD202002)资助课题。
摘 要:在提倡低碳减排的大背景下,为更好地促进供应链合作减排,研究碳标签制度下供应链收益分配问题具有重要意义.文章以具有限制联盟结构的三级供应链为研究对象,对由供应商,制造商和零售商构成的三级供应链可能形成的四种合作减排联盟情形进行分析,运用AT解和Shapley值对合作减排收益进行了收益分配.结果表明,供应链各参与者集中决策时该供应链总收益最大,且采用AT解进行收益分配的结果考虑了参与者在供应链结构中的作用,相比Shapley值其分配结果更加合理有效.It is of great significance to study the issue of supply chain revenue allocation under the carbon labeling system.This paper takes the three-level supply chain with restricted alliance structure as the research object,analyzes the four possible cooperative emission reduction alliance situations that may be formed by the three-level supply chain composed of supplier,manufacturer,and retailer,and uses AT solution and Shapley value distribute the revenue of cooperative emissions reduction.The results show that the total revenue of the supply chain is the largest when the participants in the supply chain make centralized decisions,and the distribution of revenue using the AT solution takes into account the role of the participants in the supply chain structure.Compared with the Shapley value,the distribution result is more reasonable and effective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.23.103.64