检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洪刚 HONG Gang(School of Law,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,Jiangsu,China)
出 处:《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第3期29-36,共8页Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“长三角区域一体化发展的法治协同机制研究”(20BFX013);江苏省研究生科研创新计划课题“刑事缺席审判制度研究”(KYCY21_1219)。
摘 要:“以审判为中心”是刑事诉讼制度改革的基本方向。当前,“以审判为中心”的改革未见明显成效,并不意味着“以审判为中心”的讨论和改革已经终结。“以审判为中心”贯穿刑事诉讼全过程,以庭审实质化为基本遵循,应当明确与认罪认罚从宽和以一审为重心的具体联系。在刑事诉讼制度改革中,正确处理好侦查与起诉、侦查与审判、起诉与审判三者之间的法理关系,是“以审判为中心”的改革应有之义,包括构建“大起诉”格局的侦诉关系,破除“侦查中心主义”的侦审关系,贯彻“诉审分离”原则的诉审关系。厘清侦查、起诉、审判之间的法理关系,将对“以审判为中心”的刑事诉讼制度改革产生积极影响,即庭审重心前移形成逆向制约作用、贯彻证据裁判实现统一证明标准、保障辩护权的对抗效果实现有效辩护、侦诉审关系的最终归宿是公正裁判。The “trial-centered” litigation system is the basic direction of the reform of the criminal procedure system. Although the current reform of the trial-centered litigation system has not achieved instant results, it does not mean that discussions on and reform of this system has ended. The “trial-centered” litigation system runs through the whole process of criminal proceedings, taking the substantiation of the court trial as the basic adherence. The specific connection between the leniency of admitting guilt and punishment and focusing on the first instance should be clearly defined. In the reform of the criminal procedure system, correctly handling the legal relationship between the investigation and the accusation, the investigation and the trial, and the accusation and the trial is the proper connotation of the “the trial-centered” litigation system reform, which involves constructing the so-called “big accusation” pattern, breaking the “investigation-centrism” relationship between prosecution and trial, and implementing the principle of “separation of prosecution and trial”. Clarifying the legal relationship between investigation, prosecution and trial will have a positive impact on the reform of criminal litigation system centered on the trials, in which the focus of court trials is shifted forward to form a reverse restriction;evidence-based adjudication is implemented to achieve a unified standard of proof;and efficient defense is achieved through the protection of confrontation effect of defense rights;and thus a fair adjudication is achieved as the ultimate purpose of balancing the relationship between investigation, prosecution and trial.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222