颈动脉支架植入术与颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗重度颈动脉硬化性狭窄效果对比  被引量:11

Comparative of CAS and CEA in the treatment of severe carotid atherosclerotic stenosis

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:常红娟 高士钦 王兵 梁卢允 孟欣 陈燕 CHANG Hongjuan;GAO Shiqin;WANG Bing;LIANG Luyun;MENG Xin;CHEN Yan(The Second People’s Hospital of Xinxiang,Xinxiang 453002,China)

机构地区:[1]新乡市第二人民医院,河南新乡453002

出  处:《中国实用神经疾病杂志》2022年第5期614-617,共4页Chinese Journal of Practical Nervous Diseases

基  金:新乡市科技攻关计划项目(编号:GG2020050)。

摘  要:目的 对比颈动脉支架植入术(carotid artery stenting,CAS)与颈动脉内膜剥脱术(carotid endarterectomy,CEA)治疗重度颈动脉硬化性狭窄的临床效果。方法 入组70例重度颈动脉硬化性狭窄患者,其中CAS组40例采用颈动脉支架植入术,CEA组30例采用颈动脉内膜剥脱术,对比分析两种方式的治疗效果。结果 CEA组心脏不良事件发生率(20.0%)高于CAS组(2.5%),差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.051,P=0.044)。CEA组神经性损伤及切口并发症发生率(16.7%,16.7%)均高于CAS组(0,0),差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.887,P=0.027)。CAS组和CEA组术后1 a再狭窄率差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.000,P=1.000)。结论 颈动脉支架植入术后不良反应少,对患者的损伤较小,推荐使用颈动脉支架植入术治疗重度颈动脉硬化性狭窄。Objective To compare the clinical effects of carotid artery stenting(CAS) and carotid endarterectomy(CEA) in the treatment of severe carotid atherosclerotic stenosis.Methods Seventy patients with sewere carotid atherosclerotic stenosis were enrolled,of which 40 patients in the CAS group were treated by carotid stent implantation,and 30 patients in the CEA group were treated by carotid endarterectomy.The therapeutic effects of the two methods were compared and analyzed.Results The incidence of adverse cardiac events in the CEA group(20.0%) was higher than that in the CAS group(2.5%),and the difference was statistically significant(χ^(2)=4.051,P=0.044).The incidence of neurological injury and incision complications in the CEA group(16.7%,16.7%) were higher than those in the CAS group(0,0),and the difference was statistically significant(χ^(2)=4.887,P=0.027).There was no significant difference in the restenosis rate at 1-year between the CAS group and CEA group(χ^(2)=0.000,P=1.000).Conclusion Carotid artery stent implantation has fewer adverse reactions after surgery and less damage to patients.Carotid artery stent implantation is recommended for treatment.

关 键 词:重度颈动脉硬化性狭窄 颈动脉支架植入 颈动脉内膜剥脱术 安全性 不良事件 

分 类 号:R743.1[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象